The Wimbledon Match Thread. - Page 3

cashman · 20-10-2015, 22:03

Think everyone who goes regular would agree we got a good side. Yer mentioning nowt about the crap tactics tonight though andyd.

Redraine · 20-10-2015, 22:16

The saddest sight of the night for me was to see our sub subbed. When you compare Proccy's agricultural toiling in midfield with Crookes's newly acquired skills it makes you wonder if Andy has a future at this level any more. He looked like yesterday's man I'm sorry to say.

Redraine · 20-10-2015, 22:33

Much respect for Coley for his video comments on the game. Cashy, I bet nobody was complaining about our tactics when the second goal went in, were they?

baldy · 20-10-2015, 22:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine

The saddest sight of the night for me was to see our sub subbed. When you compare Proccy's agricultural toiling in midfield with Crookes's newly acquired skills it makes you wonder if Andy has a future at this level any more. He looked like yesterday's man I'm sorry to say.

I've been thinking the same since he returned!

Most of his game has always been running round like a headless chicken, Which worked well but I think with the injuries he's had and age not on his side I think he may be struggling!

cashman · 20-10-2015, 23:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine

Much respect for Coley for his video comments on the game. Cashy, I bet nobody was complaining about our tactics when the second goal went in, were they?

The question was asked by the group behind us, why Pearson was playing left back before anyone scored.

cmonstanley · 20-10-2015, 23:34

The midfield were out of position after 10 mins sloppy wasn't the word I thought wow then back to same old Stanley. Still missing key players wouldn't have helped I think I'm a jinx lol

Redraine · 20-10-2015, 23:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

The question was asked by the group behind us, why Pearson was playing left back before anyone scored.

Presumably because we've just signed a right back to cover for Wakefield's injury!

cashman · 20-10-2015, 23:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine

Presumably because we've just signed a right back to cover for Wakefield's injury!

The guy was like a fish outa water yon, though their 2nd goal came from one of the foulest throws ive ever seen.

Kiwi John · 21-10-2015, 04:55

Checked the score 4 times while slaving away;2-0 ,3-2,3-4, 3-4. Gutted.

Redraine · 21-10-2015, 07:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiwi John

Checked the score 4 times while slaving away;2-0 ,3-2,3-4, 3-4. Gutted.

Don't worry, mate. All part of the wonderful Stanley supporting roller coaster.

lancsdave · 21-10-2015, 07:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by football19

We knew how they would play and we had to defend the second balls,

The most repeated phrase from the Wimbledon manager to his players last night..."second ball". Seems it paid off

monkey hanger · 21-10-2015, 08:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave

The most repeated phrase from the Wimbledon manager to his players last night..."second ball". Seems it paid off

hardly won any second balls after half an hour. no central midfield and a patched up make shift defence so we decide to go 2 up front. ok it worked for 10 mins. or so but after that they took over. a lot of iffs in football. if they hadn,t got their first goal as quickly or the equaliser just before half time things might have been different. the annoying thing they were there for the taking but too many players out of position who had stinkers. onward to dag and red on Saturday. another game where everything that can go wrong will go wrong. bet we,ll have Jeremy simpson or Geoff eltringham in the middle for these.