Transfer embargo - Page 14

AccyMad · 23-07-2010, 11:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

Don't you mean "just before he DIDN'T go to court last October"

Sorry Jeff, slip of the keyboard

Anyhow, slightly different version from Rob Heys in today's Observer :

"The accountants came into the club on Tuesday and brought the final drafts.
They have been sent to Ilyas Khan and Peter Marsden (current directors before Khan steps down at next board meeting) to cast a quick look over but we don't anticipate any problems. Then they should be sent to Companies House and the embargo should be lifted"

JEFF · 23-07-2010, 12:36

Heys says that the accounts have been sent to Ilyas & Peter. O'Neill says that the accounts have been sent to Companies House. Perhaps Heys & O'Neill should get together and decide which lie they are going to tell and then they can both tell the same one.

Quote:

“The accounts were sent to Companies House on Wednesday, although sometimes it can take two or three weeks to get a response,” said O’Neill.

“But there’s no panic.”

I have been sending accounts to Companies House for years and I have never had a response. Companies House NEVER respond to you lodging your accounts. So, if O'Neill is going to wait two or three weeks for a response that will take us up to Friday 13th August which is a week after the season kicks off “But there’s no panic."

Tealeaf · 23-07-2010, 12:37

Oh dear. I do hope they are not going to send the draft to Companies House. If IK & PM do agree on the draft, they will then have to receive the final version which will in turn, have to be signed off by them in the Directors Report and on the balance sheet. Only then can it be sent to Cardiff.

cashman · 23-07-2010, 13:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

Heys says that the accounts have been sent to Ilyas & Peter. O'Neill says that the accounts have been sent to Companies House. Perhaps Heys & O'Neill should get together and decide which lie they are going to tell and then they can both tell the same one.

I have been sending accounts to Companies House for years and I have never had a response. Companies House NEVER respond to you lodging your accounts. So, if O'Neill is going to wait two or three weeks for a response that will take us up to Friday 13th August which is a week after the season kicks off “But there’s no panic."

And i always thought "Mourino" was the "Special One"? seems i was wrong it must be "DoN"

Grimps · 23-07-2010, 14:29

the don is the league two special one

lancsdave · 23-07-2010, 14:31

Can't see what the problem is myself. The football league have given dispensation to Portsmouth to allow them to make their squad up to the minimum of 20. Would have thought all football league clubs would be treated the same. Seems a bit pointless having rules

DAV007 · 24-07-2010, 10:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave

Can't see what the problem is myself. The football league have given dispensation to Portsmouth to allow them to make their squad up to the minimum of 20. Would have thought all football league clubs would be treated the same. Seems a bit pointless having rules

you would hope they would apply the same dispensation to stanley.

AccyMad · 29-07-2010, 10:12

More news on the embargo in today's LET :

www.lancashiretelegraph/stanley

(again you have to click on the 'news' tab to read the article) - according to this the embargo should be lifted 'imminently' - fingers crossed

Whalley Red · 29-07-2010, 10:19

Stanley in urgent hunt for a striker (From Lancashire Telegraph)

"Stanley, who have taken former Tranmere midfielder Charlie Barnett on trial and travel to AFC Fylde for a friendly tonight, have received confirmation from the Football League that their annual accounts have now been received. The Football League want clarification on a couple of issues but the club hope their transfer embargo will be lifted imminently and are keen to start signing players from Monday.

The Reds are likely to start the season without a stadium sponsor after negotiations over a possible deal fell through – with the club unhappy with the money being offered."

It's never straightforward, is it?

AccyMad · 29-07-2010, 10:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whalley Red

Stanley in urgent hunt for a striker (From Lancashire Telegraph)

"Stanley, who have taken former Tranmere midfielder Charlie Barnett on trial and travel to AFC Fylde for a friendly tonight, have received confirmation from the Football League that their annual accounts have now been received. The Football League want clarification on a couple of issues but the club hope their transfer embargo will be lifted imminently and are keen to start signing players from Monday.

The Reds are likely to start the season without a stadium sponsor after negotiations over a possible deal fell through – with the club unhappy with the money being offered."

It's never straightforward, is it?

It wouldn't be Stanley if it was - what would we fans do without a bit of drama

JEFF · 29-07-2010, 10:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whalley Red

The Reds are likely to start the season without a stadium sponsor after negotiations over a possible deal fell through – with the club unhappy with the money being offered."

Any money offered will be more than we got last season and more than we are going to get this season. I wonder how much the Club are looking for to sponsor the ground.

cashman · 29-07-2010, 10:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

Any money offered will be more than we got last season and more than we are going to get this season. I wonder how much the Club are looking for to sponsor the ground.

Does seem rather dumb to me.

probably want enough to pay whalley off.