data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/612bf/612bfdf6567a039adcb50399f6f41ea11b8a6f0b" alt="" |
Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
18-11-2007, 18:24
|
#76
|
God Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Accrington
Posts: 2,800
Liked: 9 times
Rep Power: 33056
|
Re: vs Rotherham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oggy
Yes, the goalie's reaction was one of disbelief; as is mine, to be honest.
Thought Cav's booking had " normal service has been resumed " written all over it, especially as it was the only time he was near him the whole of the second half. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79ae8/79ae8e4d7fea2eb4d85047cd109d0de51f8687aa" alt="Embarrassment"
|
I have to say that I didnt see the incident, so cant comment Im afraid!.........(note to self, must pay more attention data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd0d9/dd0d97db81b41f53b23f17731960b61cc4493387" alt="Smilie" )
|
|
|
18-11-2007, 22:22
|
#77
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,714
Liked: 86 times
Rep Power: 2397
|
Re: vs Rotherham
Some good feedback from Rotherham fans:
Posted by Brinnieboy on 17 Nov 2007 20:33 Complain | Reply
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: just back ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did find their stewards warm and friendly though...not like some miserable ***** I've met on mi travels...
[IP address logged]
Posted by rolymiller on 17 Nov 2007 20:38 Complain | Reply
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: just back ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah agree Brinnie we were late in and they had locked up but bent over backward to help us to get in and escort us to the away end so top marks for them..........
(The contents of this post were edited on 17 Nov 20:39)
[IP address logged]
Posted by Miller67 on 17 Nov 2007 21:45 Complain | Prev | Next | Reply
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: just back ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to be fair, you've got to take into account the fact that they've been out of the pro leagues for a long time, and it'll take a long time to build up their support base, which will give them the cash to improve.
i say good luck to em, and i hope they go from strenghth to strenghth, sooner them than some i could mention
__________________
6th March 1962 - They turned off the gas but nothing could extinguish the flame!
|
|
|
18-11-2007, 22:23
|
#78
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,877
Liked: 808 times
Rep Power: 6047
|
Re: vs Rotherham
what can i say,
i miss the huddersfield game and the rotherham game and the team cant function.
Its as if their 12th man in the stands made all the difference (tounge in cheek!)
I am determined to get to Hereford so normal service of wins should presume.
1-0 at home to one of the teams expected to be in the play offs is dissapointing but not the end of the world.
|
|
|
19-11-2007, 09:54
|
#79
|
Resting In Peace
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,084
Liked: 1 times
Rep Power: 2024
|
Re: vs Rotherham
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTLawson
At the end of the day Evil is still the same dirty, aggresive thug and clearly hasn't taken his punishment from the Peterborough game seriously. We would be better off without him. Can't fault Mullin's effort and commitment
|
Isn't that what we need a bit of aggression? It's a man's game isn't it, let the opposition know you are there, rough them up a bit, that's what other teams tend to do to us. At least Evil was there when the goalie spilled the ball, Mully would have been standing about wondering what to do next. What other team has a striker who spends all the match with his back to the goal, never turns the opposition and cannot shoot? Mully has been a good servant but it's about time we had a change. Cav, Rocky and Mully first three names on the team sheet, in my opinion none of them are up to Football League standard. Coley said defensive changes would have to be made, well playing without a left back was certainly a change. I don't think Coley has any idea about defending. We have had a crap defence for years and nothing gets changed, the two weak links are still there and probably will be for ever. I think we are in for a long hard winter unless changes are made soon.
|
|
|
19-11-2007, 19:36
|
#80
|
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 181
Liked: 3 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: vs Rotherham
[quote=JEFF;495632]Isn't that what we need a bit of aggression? It's a man's game isn't it, let the opposition know you are there, rough them up a bit, that's what other teams tend to do to us. At least Evil was there when the goalie spilled the ball, Mully would have been standing about wondering what to do next. What other team has a striker who spends all the match with his back to the goal, never turns the opposition and cannot shoot? Mully has been a good servant but it's about time we had a change. quote]
Yes Jeff we need more aggression upfront but he is not the right player to give us that. He was brought on for 5 minutes on Saturday and needlessly managed to get himself booked. Agression and going for a player in the context of football are seperate. He made no attempt to win the ball-he just had a little swipe at the keeper when he thought the ref wasn't looking. ONCE AGAIN he overstepped the mark and deserved to be cautioned. Since he came back I don't think he's done anything positive for the team. He was sent off for stamping on a player against Peterborough (clearly he hasn't learnt from that), close on a few occasions to being sent off again and more importantly he is yet to find the back of the net this season. You could say the lack of goals is due to him not featuring much but on the evidence that I have seen, I believe he doesn't deserve any more chances and we have other strikers so why not use them?
Now whatever you say about Mullin (most of which I agree with), you can't escape the fact that he is currently our top goalscorer this season-he is league 2 standard-he will continue to get in positons to score for us this season given the oppertunity by Coleman. Mulllin might not be as aggressive but he's scored more times this season than Evil and is a lot less likely to be sent off.
You say he would have stood around in that inccident- I agree with you! He is proffesional enough to know when a ball can be won or not. ie. not assualting the keeper who already has the ball in his 2 hands.
I do agree however that we have based to much of our play around Mullin in recent years and league defenders know our game and are dealing with him most of the time as we saw again on saturday. It is frustrating to watch but for me Evil is only going to create more problems than solve this one. We have other strikers so lets give them a start.
Last edited by BTLawson; 19-11-2007 at 19:39.
Reason: spelling error
|
|
|
19-11-2007, 19:58
|
#81
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,686
Liked: 2 times
Rep Power: 74
|
Re: vs Rotherham
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007
what can i say .. i miss the rotherham game ....
|
Hope they've saved you a programme, pull out poster of your favourite No.11 on centre pages. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd0d9/dd0d97db81b41f53b23f17731960b61cc4493387" alt="Smilie"
__________________
..
Now it’s out in the open, there are no secrets at the club.
|
|
|
19-11-2007, 22:18
|
#82
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,714
Liked: 86 times
Rep Power: 2397
|
Re: vs Rotherham
Some fairly uncomplimentary things were said about the Stanley performance and ground on Radio Sheffield's footy phone in tonight.
Big Seth Bennett who no one will have missed from his "linesman's" vantage point in the Press Box only just conceded that Stanley were "better than a pub team" and one Rotherham female fan said she would never complain about their ground again.
__________________
6th March 1962 - They turned off the gas but nothing could extinguish the flame!
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:42.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2aa03/2aa030a141be78e5c698cc6ff19af9aba24fb234" alt="" |