York match thread

[Exile on Spencer St]

Originally Posted by missastrike

Sorry ! If you felt that was a pop at you when actually I was on about someone else ...

Try 'quoting' the comment you're aiming at and other folk won't need to respond.

[Mr Matthew]

Originally Posted by AccyMad

Excuse me?! I'm at every single home game & as many away games as I can afford & have been for more years than I care to remember - even was one of the intrepid bunch who did the 560 odd mile round trip to Yeovil whereas you only seem to have popped up recently - don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the length of time anyone has been supporting Stanley makes them any better a fan than more recent converts but what gives you the right to question anyone else's support?

He's not a Stanley fan anyway. He's a Crooks fan and nothing else.

Good riddance to both.

[cashman]

Just back only thing to say is WHY? again start with a lad that is not a striker, never will be, when theres lads in the squad, they aint prolific but will pop up with a goal occasionally.The super one should at least have the decency to explain this striker that never was, but somehow i doubt it.

[Chubbyman]

Back home to angry to comment ,I'll leave it to Cashman.....I will say one thing...Super Johnny Coleman couldn't pick his nose....He must be getting paid to play Crookes..simple as

[cashman]

Also the york goal our 6ft odd striker was outjumped by a lad who looked at least 6" shorter, Have just read the crap J.C. has just come out with, It was HIS fault fer the team he put out simple as, also crap is they put 10 behind the ball, that was only in last 10 mins, they dominated the game after their lad was sent off n attacked the arse off us.

[FrankMoody]

Originally Posted by cashman

Just back only thing to say is WHY? again start with a lad that is not a striker, never will be, when theres lads in the squad, they aint prolific but will pop up with a goal occasionally.The super one should at least have the decency to explain this striker that never was, but somehow i doubt it.

Agree with above, some questions for the tactical genius:

Why was Crooks playing? (Almost felt sorry for him today, looked shot, shouldn't have been playing)

Has anyone seen Moly play well since he's been back?

Why put The erratic Windass on when Naismith was sitting there (remember his set pieces on sat?)

We actually looked quite lively with Gray and McCarten together and looked like we might get something (definitely one cast iron penalty denied) until the tactical genius stuck Aldred up from as well, dragging extra defenders in so there was no space for the other two.

Also why, when we throw a c back up front to give us a physical presence, do we keep playing tippy tippy at the back?? Hunt didn't play a forward pass more than 5 yards all day - awful performance.

Then to cap a miserable day the tactical genius insults everyone by complaining of inconsistency when his team selections and decisions actually go a long way to create the inconsistencies!!

[smudgie]

Tactical genius = My arse.

No Carver on the bench again...... For yet another petty reason. Yet golden boy starts...

Absolute joke.

[DAV007]

Do we have to pay Crooks wages if he doesnt start?

[Chubbyman]

Originally Posted by DAV007

Do we have to pay Crooks wages if he doesnt start?

DAV he's seriously out of sorts,we would have beat Yeovil twice if it wasn't for Crookes..So no matter what it costs us we shouldn't be playing him..In my eyes Colemans cost Stanley 1/2 a million playing him...Super Johnny Coleman my arse.

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by DAV007

Do we have to pay Crooks wages if he doesnt start?

If he doesn't appear on the pitch I think is more accurate... hence his introduction as sub against Wycombe...........

[keep the faith]

Originally Posted by FrankMoody

Agree with above, some questions for the tactical genius:

Why was Crooks playing? (Almost felt sorry for him today, looked shot, shouldn't have been playing)

Has anyone seen Moly play well since he's been back?

Why put The erratic Windass on when Naismith was sitting there (remember his set pieces on sat?)

We actually looked quite lively with Gray and McCarten together and looked like we might get something (definitely one cast iron penalty denied) until the tactical genius stuck Aldred up from as well, dragging extra defenders in so there was no space for the other two.

Also why, when we throw a c back up front to give us a physical presence, do we keep playing tippy tippy at the back?? Hunt didn't play a forward pass more than 5 yards all day - awful performance.

Then to cap a miserable day the tactical genius insults everyone by complaining of inconsistency when his team selections and decisions actually go a long way to create the inconsistencies!!

Well there's one thing for sure, Crooks is CONSISTENTLY crap and Coleman CONSISTENTLY picks him regardless of being CONSISTENTLY criticized by the supporters.

[smudgie]

I can only imagine how down Gray, Carver and Bowerman are right now !

[Redraine]

Originally Posted by smudgie

I can only imagine how down Gray, Carver and Bowerman are right now !

Especially when you consider that Gray is still our top scorer in spite of hardly having a sniff of game time since the loanees came in!

[Exile on Spencer St]

“We are also not taking our chances and we are too inconsistent. We have got to get the right formula and ingredients to win games.”

[cashman]

Originally Posted by Exile on Spencer St

“We are also not taking our chances and we are too inconsistent. We have got to get the right formula and ingredients to win games.”

Perfectly true, but yeh need the lads wi the best chances of taking them imho, thats gotta be part of the formula.