Barnet match thread

Symes was very good tonight, won most balls in the air, held play up brilliantly and linked up well with everybody, his best display in months!!!
 
football19 said:
there number 7 was adomah,hes rated one of the best wingers in the division,dont think acci could afford him,he will be playing at an higher level next year i am sure,deanos quick but hes like usain bolt !!! although hes not been on a winning side against acci this year
Click to expand...

Yep must a have been so glazed over with the excitement of a win could'nt read the name on the shirt:o
 
Yes, well done Ultras - absolutely brilliant yet again! However, to come to more mundane matters, like last night's game, was anyone else impressed by the display of Peter Murphy when he came on? I make no bones about it, I just didn't think he was good enough. but I thought that last night he provided exactly what we've been lacking - someone to break down attacks and win balls in front of the centre of our back four. Could it be that he has at last found his true role? It may be just me, but I like to give credit where it's due, so well done Peter!
 
well gotta say,i thought Murphy had a steady game when came on, be interesting to see if he retains his place on sat.
 
Oldgobbin said:
was anyone else impressed by the display of Peter Murphy when he came on? I make no bones about it, I just didn't think he was good enough. but I thought that last night he provided exactly what we've been lacking - someone to break down attacks and win balls in front of the centre of our back four. Could it be that he has at last found his true role? It may be just me, but I like to give credit where it's due, so well done Peter!
Click to expand...

I think that you may have got Murphy and Flynn mixed up. As I saw it Murphy hardly put a foot right and didn't pass the ball to a Stanley player all night.
 
JEFF said:
I think that you may have got Murphy and Flynn mixed up. As I saw it Murphy hardly put a foot right and didn't pass the ball to a Stanley player all night.
Click to expand...
I too thought Flynn was very good, but didn't notice Murphy too much. However, I don't remember him being as bad as that, either.
 
Sorry Jeff, can't agree. I thought Flynn was great when he moved back to replace Darran but didn't handle the midfield destroying job anywhere near as well as Murphy. Incidentally, contrary to what you seem to believe -"I think that you may have got Murphy and Flynn mixed up"I'm not totally stupid!
 
Didn't think Murphy played at all well, but I don't blame him as he was thrown in at the deep end. Flynn played well both in midfield and at centre-half.
 
Fair enough Shaker. As I said before,I don't think Murphy has really got the ability to play at this level, so I was probably looking for the best in him after a few quite disappointing performances. It's easy to kick a man when he's down and I really did think he played quite well last night, so thought it might be an idea to give the lad a bit of encouragement. Evidently most other people didn't see his display in the same light, so maybe I'd better make an appointment at Specsavers tomorrow!:)

​
 
Have to agree with oldgobbin,thought murphy did the job asked of him very well ie holding midfield roll ,He was very effective and disciplined and didnt allow the balls to be played into there forwards feet.
They had to go ariel and flynn and edwards dealt with it.
He didnt run around like a chicken with no head ! and i thought he played the role as good if not better than flynn.
Accis midfield have been crying out for a holding midfielder for months and it was a big call by the manager to put a defender in there in lieu of a normal midfielder
 
I thought Pete Murphy did ok, certainly didn't notice him make any glaring errors but why put him on in midfield when we had John Mullin on the bench??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top