Biscuit or Cake?

Chocolate Teacake - What would you class it as

  • Cake

    Votes: 9 31.0%
  • Biscuit

    Votes: 16 55.2%
  • Confectionery

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Havent the foggiest!!!!

    Votes: 3 10.3%

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .

shillelagh

Town Elder
Tackler
BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Teacake set to cost taxman £3.5m

The VAT man owes M&S £3.5 million because they classed teacakes as biscuits and not cakes!!! But the thing is the customers bought the teacakes the customers paid the VAT on them - so why give it back to M&S when it was the customers who paid it. If they do i hope m&s give it back to the customers somehow discounts on stuff etc

By the way would you class a chocolate teacake as a cake or a biscuit?
 
Erm... biscuit - they were biscuit and mallow last time i got them - or am i thinking of something different
 
By the way would you class a chocolate teacake as a cake or a biscuit?

I think the answer to this is to leave one out on the kitchen worktop for a couple of days.

I believe that if it goes soft it's a biscuit.

If it goes hard and dry it's a cake. :)
 
Jaffa cakes go hard so I class them as a cake.

A jaffa cake is only one gobfull though. ;)

Jaffa cakes definitely a cake Lilly. An ex-girlfriend of my sons once got asked this in an interview :confused: She is a physiotherapist ! .. LOL. Luckily, her father worked for McVities and was able to give the correct answer.

Choc. Teacakes .. yes .. would say a cake.

Don't really eat biscuits or cake so can't do a test.
 
Jaffa cakes go hard so I class them as a cake.

A jaffa cake is only one gobfull though. ;)

This is from that link
Under UK tax rules, most traditional bakery products such as bread, cakes, flapjacks and Jaffa Cakes are free of VAT, but the tax is payable on cereal bars, shortbread and partly-coated or wholly-coated biscuits.
 
I would say that its a biscuit, when i buy them they are always with the biscuits and not on the cake aisle
 
I would say that its a biscuit, when i buy them they are always with the biscuits and not on the cake aisle

Well, that's logical reasoning I suppose .... :D:D

Does anybody know the reason for one being taxed and not the other ?

Is cake thought of as more of a necessity or something ? Usually have the same types of ingredients ... :confused:
 
But the thing is the customers bought the teacakes the customers paid the VAT on them - so why give it back to M&S when it was the customers who paid it.

HMRC would have to refund M&S the VAT because it was charged on their turnover figure. The consumer is only paying the RRP and wouldn`t be able to claim the VAT back as they are not VAT registered. It does mean that M&S has made an extra amount of profit, which of course they will have to add to their turnover figure on which they will be charged corporation tax. VAT is taxed at 17.5% and corporation tax is 28%, so the winners are......:eek:
 
Biscuit, because it is biscuit and mallow covered in chocolate. Nothing cake-like about it.
 
You'd have to ask that of the Minster responsible for this matter, Marie Antoinette.:D

Except would have to find the head to ask if she really made that statement ... wonder if they actually buried the head with the rest of her ? ...sorry thread wander.
 
I would call it a biscuit, while we are on the stupid vat rules, we buy some products in at 8% vat, some at 17.5% vat, but if those items are sold in with a job, some of the job is 8% and some of it is 17.5%??? I also remember Marshalls mono being invoiced £25k by revenue and customs because the offices had free coffee machines!
 
Back
Top