Coley previews Exeter ?

C

cashman

Coffin Dodger.
Overlooker
I read that just before tea and bottom of page it said Ross Sykes has been recalled from southport, it has now been removed from the article. WHY?
 
From what folk said on here, you're right Cashy. Exeter, though, are not quite the same as Wycombe, but, whatever formation, am looking to see Stanley today.
 
To recall Ross Sykes from Southport only to sit him back on the bench is total madness. The lad was voted fans player of the month and was given MOM a couple of times during his short spell at the club. talk about a kick in the b*****cs, what a way to destroy an 18 year old's confidence. I just can't believe it!!!
 
It also would've been madness to drop any of our defenders who played against Wycombe on Tuesday to accommodate Ross, I doubt any player coming back from a loan spell expects to go straight into the team - I'm assuming he was brought back to be included in the squad in case he was needed, today Coley decided he wasn't - doesn't mean he won't be given his chance soon
 
AccyMad said:
It also would've been madness to drop any of our defenders who played against Wycombe on Tuesday to accommodate Ross, I doubt any player coming back from a loan spell expects to go straight into the team - I'm assuming he was brought back to be included in the squad in case he was needed, today Coley decided he wasn't - doesn't mean he won't be given his chance soon
Click to expand...
No-one mentioned dropping anyone who played tuesday,:rolleyes:
 
Maybe my interpretation Cashy but I thought it was inferred in Keep the Faith's post,'recalling Sykes just to stick him on the bench is madness' - on reflection he could've meant he'd have been better staying at Southport & getting games?
 
AccyMad said:
Maybe my interpretation Cashy but I thought it was inferred in Keep the Faith's post,'recalling Sykes just to stick him on the bench is madness' - on reflection he could've meant he'd have been better staying at Southport & getting games?
Click to expand...
I know keep the faith,never expected the lad to start yesterday,in my view the lad woulda been better at southport playing,were he was very happy, this to me is the perfect way,to lose a lad who has the potential to make the grade.
 
Injuries that remain internal club business

Not wishing the opposition to know of these issues

Only being allowed to name 5 loanees in the match day squad.

Why does every piece of club information have go into the public domain??

IF Coley and the club don't mention it surely that's their choice??
 
AccyMad said:
Maybe my interpretation Cashy but I thought it was inferred in Keep the Faith's post,'recalling Sykes just to stick him on the bench is madness' - on reflection he could've meant he'd have been better staying at Southport & getting games?
Click to expand...


That was exactly the point I was trying to make!!!
 
Mr T said:
Injuries that remain internal club business

Not wishing the opposition to know of these issues

Only being allowed to name 5 loanees in the match day squad.

Why does every piece of club information have go into the public domain??

IF Coley and the club don't mention it surely that's their choice??
Click to expand...
Yer talking rubbish but thats nowt unusual, it was posted on coley previews exeter, and the removed later on.:rolleyes: was asking why it was removed, perhaps someone who actually knows can answer that.:rolleyes:
 
It seems to me that this new 3-4-3 system is Coleys plan B, but with only 3 recognised centre backs (plus Thorniley maybe) Sykes is needed as cover?

I think the 343 exposes a limited squad to be fair
 
the more a club is seen as secretive about any issues the more that silly rumour start and spread like wildfire. remember Mr.T we are only paying fans at the end of the day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top