I've never made an error in any literature produced.![]()
Has any literature even been produced for Karen Buckley?
Maybe they're too scared of typos and looking foolish and disorganised.
I've never made an error in any literature produced.![]()
Has any literature even been produced for Karen Buckley?
Maybe they're too scared of typos and looking foolish and disorganised.

Graham, who proof read your literature?

Graham, who proof read your literature?

I don't know who proofreads your literature, Andrew (whatever your "literature" might be), but I do hope that, unlike you, they realise that "proofread" is one word.![]()

This is Accringtonweb, I'd put a little more effort into proofreading if it cost me £600 a post.![]()
I have said before I like Cameron, one of the very few who does

I think you are being picky Andrew. Good english is helpful but we are in danger of going back to Gordon Browns one eye'd, black marker pen issue.
I always make errors when typing from my mobile and half of those are the automated error correction.
I make tons of errors on Accyweb too.
any more outbursts like that and im gonna spoil my vote on the lib dems![]()
Ok, DC love in over.
The Gay Times interview and a number of other issues have left me not so sure he is genuine. The kids in politics thing and the recent Cam the Sam pregnancy. The Punch and Judy politics when he said he was against Punch and Judy politics. The constant personal attacks on Gordon Brown (and Brown has stayed above it all in my view).
The endless dishwater platitudes. Nice to positive but the millionth time of no policy detail, just "look! we're going to things different" and "look! we're going to clean up politics", "look! we're going to clean up this mess". "look! we're going to do something about it". Dishwater.
I am beginning to think that Howard and Hague offered more in 2005 and 2001. Howard would not have blown out that Gay Times interview. It's looking more like 'Cam - what a Sham' (look! he's losing my support fast!).
Cameron is genuine..a genuine tory....I would not take any gaff's he makes as being any significance in the run up to the general election, because it will be put in the shade by the media.Ok, DC love in over.
The Gay Times interview and a number of other issues have left me not so sure he is genuine. The kids in politics thing and the recent Cam the Sam pregnancy. The Punch and Judy politics when he said he was against Punch and Judy politics. The constant personal attacks on Gordon Brown (and Brown has stayed above it all in my view).
The endless dishwater platitudes. Nice to positive but the millionth time of no policy detail, just "look! we're going to things different" and "look! we're going to clean up politics", "look! we're going to clean up this mess". "look! we're going to do something about it". Dishwater.
I am beginning to think that Howard and Hague offered more in 2005 and 2001. Howard would not have blown out that Gay Times interview. It's looking more like 'Cam - what a Sham' (look! he's losing my support fast!).
The Gay Times interview and a number of other issues have left me not so sure he is genuine.
any more outbursts like that and im gonna spoil my vote on the lib dems![]()
Even the good old, ever reliable and factual, Tory supporting, Daily Telegraph, reports just how badly the Conservative leadership looks, after the cringe making gaffes Cameron made, whilst courting the pink vote, amongst other things they've done recently.
'Dave, since his car-crash interview with Gay Times, is perceived as high-risk in the vicinity of a television camera; George has just demonstrated on the BBC’s Today programme that he should not be allowed near a radio studio.
Most Tories hate David Cameron and cannot wait to see him crash and burn – Telegraph Blogs

And Tory voters desperate to see Labour out loathe Cameron too. And where will that leave us if Labour were dispensed with?
A mess.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.