Isnt this Rascist ?

Things like that have always seemed racist to me. I think we'd all get on a lot better if people stopped making distinctions for skin colour. We don't do it for eye colour or hair colour or shoe size do we?
 
There is a group for black and ethnic minority solicitors, female solicitors too... I think sometimes support networks are needed.

Maybe we could get rid of unions and groups altogether and ignore class differences too. That would be interesting.
 
There is a group for black and ethnic minority solicitors, female solicitors too... I think sometimes support networks are needed.

Maybe we could get rid of unions and groups altogether and ignore class differences too. That would be interesting.
maybe you would not be were you are now, if unions hadn't existed,:rolleyes: we would all still be touching our forelocks to our masters,:rolleyes:
 
Unions are not the same at all. Unions make no racial distinctions unless we have a 'black workers union' or some such.
 
maybe you would not be were you are now, if unions hadn't existed,:rolleyes: we would all still be touching our forelocks to our masters,:rolleyes:
You mean you don't still do that cashy:D, and there's me thinking we all had to bow down to Gordon:mosher:
 
I've always had a problem with this positive discrimination, we're always being told that we live in an integrated society, but yet we have Black Trade Unions, Black Police officers associations, even the MOBOs Music of Back Origin. Just inmagine the uproar there'd be be if some one came up with MOWOs, Music of White Origin. The PC bregade can't have it both ways, its all or nothing, either we're all racists or nobody is, you can't have one rule for one set of people and another for the others based on the colour of the skin
 
Yes, by it's very nature, this is racist.

Apparently there's a long list of associations you can join in the Met, if you're part of that demographic.

There are Jewish, Women's, Gay, Sikh, Muslim, as well as black groups.

Since there are laws already in place if is someone is discriminated against, on grounds of religion, gender, sexual orientation, race or creed, there really should be no need for such organisations, and their very presence is divisive.
 
I disagree that it is racist - I think there is a need for certain jobs and that they are justified.
For example the womens centre in accrington/blackburn can advertise for just women workers because of the sensitive nature of the support they can provide. That isnt sexist it is a need being met.

Now tell me ...

you are in the middle of Moss side you are called to an incident where a yardie is waving a gun around irratically shouting and bawling in a really thick Jamaican accent you need to calm him down quickly but you dont understand a word he is saying except for the fact that he is calling you white scum.

what would you do ?

it happens and unfortunately these are times where jobs are allocated to certain sexes, races or abilities because it is the best option for the situations that crop up in that job.

If there was a job offered for a roofer - would you be saying it was discrmination if it stated you had to have arms and legs

damn you damn you all lol:pmad: :ptongue:

:jam1::lol::lol:


oh and it turns out he wasnt a yadrie after all - he had dropped his contact lens and was trying to stop people standing on it - the gun was a water pistol to moisturise his eye ballsies
 
Last edited:
When I was still a working Civil Servant I was not at all happy to hear about meetings of Black Civil Servants, Women C Ss etc. I always felt that if white male C Ss rose up in protest I would have to support them. I believe in equality and that means for everyone, no special deal for anyone. We will never achieve that if ethnic groups insist on forming their own factions.
 
I do agree partly with you west ender there are circumstances where there is no need for it and it could be discriminatory in one way or another but... i do think there is a need for it in some situations.
 
Yes, by it's very nature, this is racist.

Apparently there's a long list of associations you can join in the Met, if you're part of that demographic.

There are Jewish, Women's, Gay, Sikh, Muslim, as well as black groups.

Since there are laws already in place if is someone is discriminated against, on grounds of religion, gender, sexual orientation, race or creed, there really should be no need for such organisations, and their very presence is divisive.

Rindy you have got that spot on....If I want to be in a black association you need to be black.....If you want to declare yourself as catholic...so be it......If you want to come out as a gay...go for it.
I am an Englishman, born, bread and educated in the English culture....Why should I change?
Why should we careful when we come out with a statement that is true?
The mind boggles :rolleyes:
 
What you are talking about Keetah isn't racism, it's common sense, but having a 'black police' ORGANISATION or a black anything organisation IS racist.

Interestingly, according to a militant black guy on TV the other day it would appear that, pale as I am, I am in fact a black person due to my ancestry. I wonder if I would be permitted to join one of these exclusivly black organisations. ;)
 
I do agree partly with you west ender there are circumstances where there is no need for it and it could be discriminatory in one way or another but... i do think there is a need for it in some situations.
disagree keetah, should always be "Best Person fer Job" n yeh if its summat down the "moss" the best person is more likely to be west indian, don't see owt wrong wi that, stating it must be, is a dangerous route to take i reckon.
 
I can't believe people actually took my comment seriously.

My point when I am sarcastic is generally hinting at 'if we did this, what would the next thing be'.

It never just stops at one change does it.
 
Just double checking that there isn't a 'white police association', which of course there isn't, as that would be deemed as racist, I came across this ludicrous nugget.

'Of course, the National Black Police Association claims it is interested only in promoting racial harmony, both within the force and in relations between the police and the public. (It also makes the extraordinary claim on its website, in an attempt to justify its choice of name: 'The definition of "black" does not refer to skin colour.' So what does it refer to then?)'

TOM UTLEY: I'm enough of a wishy-washy liberal to be horrified by some of the Ali G antics of our police | Mail Online
 
Just double checking that there isn't a 'white police association', which of course there isn't, as that would be deemed as racist, I came across this ludicrous nugget.

'Of course, the National Black Police Association claims it is interested only in promoting racial harmony, both within the force and in relations between the police and the public. (It also makes the extraordinary claim on its website, in an attempt to justify its choice of name: 'The definition of "black" does not refer to skin colour.' So what does it refer to then?)'

TOM UTLEY: I'm enough of a wishy-washy liberal to be horrified by some of the Ali G antics of our police | Mail Online

I was taught my 'English legal systems and methods' module by a feminist this year, who also taught me criminal law... and she clearly was on a mission to slag off men and make them look sexist and terrible at every opportunity, completely disregarding the fact that there are women who have both got to great heights in the legal profession and that have committed the same heinous crimes that men are capable of committing.

I think this type of atitude, particularly when she addressed all the girls in the class and said we WILL be discriminated against, is nothing but damaging and it should be stamped out. Unfortunately there are people that carry on with teaching these kinds of attitudes and I dont think it will ever go away. Shame really.
 
I was taught my 'English legal systems and methods' module by a feminist this year, who also taught me criminal law... and she clearly was on a mission to slag off men and make them look sexist and terrible at every opportunity, completely disregarding the fact that there are women who have both got to great heights in the legal profession and that have committed the same heinous crimes that men are capable of committing.

I think this type of atitude, particularly when she addressed all the girls in the class and said we WILL be discriminated against, is nothing but damaging and it should be stamped out. Unfortunately there are people that carry on with teaching these kinds of attitudes and I dont think it will ever go away. Shame really.

I was taught art history by a hard-line feminist lecturer, for some bizarre reason.

Happily I made mince meat out of her, week after week, term after term.

She did in the end concede that by it's very nature feminism is sexist.

Besides, on the politically correct scale of perceived injustice, I scored more highly than her.:D
 
Back
Top