Itma !!.. A gillingham thread !.

Status
Not open for further replies.
yonmon

yonmon

Pillar o' t' Community
Tackler
ITMA...!

As well as welcoming another home win for the Reds tomorrow, I am more than certain that Gillingham's Manager.. the only Man to have had more clubs than Colin Montgomery !... Will be welcomed with open arms by many Stanley stalwarts as he wobbles along to the away dugout !.

Seriously, we meet another side who I am sure JC will prepare for with respect, and look forward to more of the great football which we all witnesed last Saturday !.

As for Steve Evans ?.. I didn't mean it... honestly ??. 🤔🤔😎😎

ON STANLEY!.. ON !!.
 
Andy and Buzzer tweeted that the pitch is looking great and drains are working well.
Forecast is for more rain this morning but easing off a lot from noon.
Before Andy spent the £300k on the pitch and retaining walls the match would have definitely been called off IMHO.
Well done and massive thanks Andy.

COME ON STANLEY.
Back to winning ways today after the ‘Blip’ on Wednesday.
 
For various reasons couldn't make it today another home defeat by a club near us in the league Coleman said he doesn't like changing his starting 11 much that's ok when your winning and towards the top end of the table, why have such a big squad then are they good enough we are close to the bottom Bolton points deducted Southend look worse than us but the other bottom 3 spot is wide open we need some form soon.
 
Not sure, how we lost that one. Luck wasn't on our side along with a lack of preditory striking (I am hoping baker-richardson can be the answer) and discipline regards being onside. We created far more than the gills although the Kent team I felt always had a goal in them. Atmosphere was a bit flat in the Clayton end today, we need to be that 12th Man to Scrabble the points for another season of league 1. I felt we needed a bit of quality as well as the endeavour unfortunately we did have quite enough quality and luck today to get us the points.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
 
Gills have to be the worst side i have seen at the Wham this season, no doubt at all,felt our side shoulda been freshened up long before football genius did, but thats nowt new. gills keeper did make 3 really good stops i thought.the correct MoM was chosen mind wasn't much to pick from today,the lineswoman should have stopped at home and done the ironing for all the use she was.
 
chevyfire said:
Not sure, how we lost that one. Luck wasn't on our side along with a lack of preditory striking (I am hoping baker-richardson can be the answer) and discipline regards being onside. We created far more than the gills although the Kent team I felt always had a goal in them. Atmosphere was a bit flat in the Clayton end today, we need to be that 12th Man to Scrabble the points for another season of league 1. I felt we needed a bit of quality as well as the endeavour unfortunately we did have quite enough quality and luck today to get us the points.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Courtney has some qualities he comes from an expremier club but will he (going back to my previous thread) be selected I fear not.
 
ferret man said:
You do mean Sunday yonmon ?
Click to expand...

Posted on Friday night FM !... I suppose I could have fast forwarded and said 'today ' rather than 'tomorrow ' !
But if it had been tomorrow or Sunday then everyone would know what was going to happen in the afternoon and hence been better prepared for all that really happened today as opposed to tomorrow when I would have been able to post something about today not tomorrow which would have taken us into Monday,.. and Stanley never play on a Monday anyway !... just a thought !.

But apart from all that , did you enjoy the game today and have you any analysis to pass on to me to read and digest and help me to while away a long and cold October evening ?.

Keep em coming !.. VBW !. 😎
 
a game we should have won I blame their goalkeeper, the goal posts & that stupid ball that refused to go in the onion bag, or as kiwi would have put it £$%^&*&%&@@>><><::()&^£$£$
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top