I was actually just looking at your signature AccyLassOh I'm sure I'm somet... just not sure if it's strange
While reading all about burnley and what a good job that owen coyle has done ... i saw this comment ...
1. At 10:31am on 13 May 2009, HoldenIBM wrote:
Blackburn Rovers Vs Burnley next season? Hollands pies all round, and for the first time since 1995 there will be thirty-thousand crowd at Ewood Park...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulfletcher/2009/05/burnley_march_on_but_the_hurt.html#084433
That true? that there hasnt been 30,000+ at ewood park since then?
By the way that is the first comment on that blog .....
1. At 10:31am on 13 May 2009, HoldenIBM wrote:
Blackburn Rovers Vs Burnley next season? Hollands pies all round, and for the first time since 1995 there will be thirty-thousand crowd at Ewood Park...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulfletcher/2009/05/burnley_march_on_but_the_hurt.html#084433
That true? that there hasnt been 30,000+ at ewood park since then?
By the way that is the first comment on that blog .....
I reckon you should take a closer look at Rovers teamsheets Jaysay..not many Englishmen in your first team!Because United players learn their trade in Argentina, Madeira, Holland Brazil, Eastern Europe, the Far East
most likely true..Rovers managed to buy the league in '95 but the glory hunters started to fade away when Jack Walkers money dried up!While reading all about burnley and what a good job that owen coyle has done ... i saw this comment ...
1. At 10:31am on 13 May 2009, HoldenIBM wrote:
Blackburn Rovers Vs Burnley next season? Hollands pies all round, and for the first time since 1995 there will be thirty-thousand crowd at Ewood Park
That true? that there hasnt been 30,000+ at ewood park since then?
at least uncle jack was a true blackburn fan, unlike uniteds n Chelsea's owners.most likely true..Rovers managed to buy the league in '95 but the glory hunters started to fade away when Jack Walkers money dried up!
n if ya check ya may find rovers were not top spenders in premier back then.
most likely true..Rovers managed to buy the league in '95 but the glory hunters started to fade away when Jack Walkers money dried up!
14 years on and it still narks em.
No it was still United even then cashy, but no one mentioned that it was always money bags Rovers, just like its now money bags City, and with your reckoning Mancie, United have bought the league quite a few times themselves, if money is the only thing required to win itat least uncle jack was a true blackburn fan, unlike uniteds n Chelsea's owners.
Narks um cause we took it off the Trophy hunters at the Theatre of Merchandising Roy14 years on and it still narks em.
Thats funny there weren't 30,000 there the last twice we ave um a football lesson JenWhile reading all about burnley and what a good job that owen coyle has done ... i saw this comment ...
1. At 10:31am on 13 May 2009, HoldenIBM wrote:
Blackburn Rovers Vs Burnley next season? Hollands pies all round, and for the first time since 1995 there will be thirty-thousand crowd at Ewood Park...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulfletcher/2009/05/burnley_march_on_but_the_hurt.html#084433
That true? that there hasnt been 30,000+ at ewood park since then?
By the way that is the first comment on that blog .....
I reckon you've got fat Jack AND West Ham to thank for that title!
I reckon you've got fat Jack AND West Ham to thank for that title!
Yes...................................
I reckon you've got fat Jack AND West Ham to thank for that title!
Jack Walker was a True Blue Rover and would'nt every supporter of every other team loved to have had someone geniune like him helping to provide them with some success. The ammount of jealously that still emerges because of the "Fairy Tale" is laughable....everyone wants the underdog to win...unless of course your not one of the underdogs.
To say that we have West Ham to "thank" for winning the title is also a load of Bull....the only way that West Ham had the chance to affect the title destination was if Rovers lost against Liverpool, which we did of course, but had we won that last game, Utd would'nt have been given a sniff, so it was Rovers that actually Gifted Utd that chance, we had been in the Box Seat for ages and still were on the final day! The fact is we nearly blew it...Utd did'nt lose it!!
Best Regards - Taggy
Well if that's the case cashy it could be that Liverpool have tonked United twice this season, the 4-1 win at the Theatre of Merchandising was very impressiveunless of course mancie means oer a full season,the best team DON'T win it.