Team v. Bury

R

Redraine

Resting in Peace
Tackler
Lets have 11 proper players on from the start. If Putterill had come on with half an hour to go I'm sure we would have finished Chesterfield off. How come he can't get a start after galvanising our play when he came on at Morecambe to secure the win? To bring him on today with only 5 minutes to go was ludicrous. Coley's subbing, or lack of it, drives me crazy:(
 
Cisak
Bateson Edwards Long Winnard
Procter Joyce
Barnett Craney Ryan
Gornell​
Subs:
Dunbavin
Hessey
Richardson
Parkinson
Putterill
McConville
Boulding
 
Have to agree with you Redraine,we should have countered there subs with a sub or two of our own.but we're not the manager;):)
 
i would start with 4 4 2. i think 4 5 1 at home is too negative and with their big centre backs it wont work.

Cisak
winnard long edwards jacobsen
mcconville proctor ryan putterill
craney gornell
 
would go for 4132
cisak
jacoeson long edwards winnard
barnett
joyce craney ryan
putterill ( razor)
gornell

subs use them
any one that will come on
 
stanleyfan said:
i would start with 4 4 2. i think 4 5 1 at home is too negative and with their big centre backs it wont work.

Cisak
winnard long edwards jacobsen
mcconville proctor ryan putterill
craney gornell
Click to expand...

:eek:

Exactly what was negative about our playing philosophy yesterday?
 
He did not rest anybody after a gap of one day, what makes you think he will change it after four????

To be honest, even if he does, it is too late!! Monday was the time to change it, but he did not!! 60mins was the time to change it/freshen it up, but he did not!!

We all know the score, it is his weak point, but I just wish that he would learn...

Would not change it too much, but Ray Putterill, from the start, I feel is a must!!
 
Winnard has not played well for a while now and if Jacobson was staying on loan then i would say drop him and play bateson at right back. That would be only change as the rest of team were alright apart from 5 minutes saturday. Altough i would of considered taking mcconville, who apart from the goal and one good corner did nothin, and craney who ran out of steam off for putterill and turner for something different.

But now craney, long and jacobson's loans have ran out changes will have to be made anyway
 
agree about winnard decent defender but distribution leaves alot to be desired. assuming loans are extended i would go
bavvo
richardson long sunbed jacobson
proctor barnett
ryan craney sean mc
terry

agree sean doesnt do alot but has a knack for sniffing out a goal so i would leave him in. putteril to come on late with all his energy
 
Chris Turner out with foot injury!! And having a scan to see what damage there is, likely to be out till end of jan:(
 
Accy aggro , u seem 2 have a downer on deano, as u are a new member,are u a friend or related to someone who he's keeping out the team ?, u want him out the team when coleman doesn't
 
Stanleymad said:
Really ??? where did u get that from ? hmmmmm:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I was talking to Chris at the Morecambe game at half time and he mentioned the scan after i'd asked if he had recovered from his injury:)which he got on the training ground:(
 
In order to get something out of this one.....

Two players of theirs need stopping I feel. Mozika in Midfield and Lowe up front. I'd advocate somebody man for man on Mozika who'll go in hard and fair on him (to me Joyce fits that mould) and I think we've got to put the best man in defence man for man on Lowe......that to me means Big Phil Edwards.:confused:

Take them two out of the equation and I think we're halfway to getting a result.:)

Also, forget the 4-5-1 or 4-2-3-1 or whatever.....We're home..If we're too cautious and bearing in mind Bury are better away than at Gigg and they'll be roared on by a large following, we might end up chasing a result rather than bossing one.:o

If it was me.... I'd go 3-4-1-2.......Gornell and Craney up top, Ryan behind,Proccy and Joyce in centre Midfield, wide-men /wingbacks up for debate !!!Edwards, Hessey & Long at the back. Bavs as keeper as we don't have much scope in that department.....

I still stand by what I've said at start of season.....the lack of a keeper who commands his area and marshalls his defence is holding this side back.:(
 
Bateson def should be in ...WHAT HAS HAPPENED BETWEEN COLEY and HIM? SINCE HE GOT SENT OFF HE HASN'T FEATURED IN THE TEAM???
Up to then he played superbly as an attacking defender ...and his throw ins are worth a free kick!!!!
Obviously the best team would be 10 Jimmy Ryan's and a good goalkeeper:-)
 
carpon said:
Also, forget the 4-5-1 or 4-2-3-1 or whatever.....We're home..If we're too cautious and bearing in mind Bury are better away than at Gigg and they'll be roared on by a large following, we might end up chasing a result rather than bossing one
Click to expand...

I think some people let the fact that we only play with one recognised striker fool them into thinking that our formation is negative. It's not, in any way. It promotes short passing and high movement. We play with three attacking midfielders for God's sake. It's not a traditional 4-5-1 in that it is much less static; rarely do we see Gornell isolated as we did in the 'punt it up to Mullers' days.

Regarding Mozika, I hope he doesn't show up, the cheat. For that matter Futcher and Sodje can stay at home, too.
 
shakermaker said:
Regarding Mozika, I hope he doesn't show up, the cheat. For that matter Futcher and Sodje can stay at home, too.
Click to expand...

They can all show up for me Shaker, as long as they go back sulking!!!! ;) :) Especially that Sodje.........

"He wears his wifes' knickers......." :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top