£3.5 million?.. peanuts!... considering that most insurance companies require a reported crime number that you get by phoning up your local police station .. and then the police having to call you back with a crime number ..I don't see that as practical and sure its costs more than £3.5 million...you lot need to get in touch with progress and embrace new technology!
I'm not blind..charming?... there are only two political parties that have governed this country in the last 90yrs... so you takes yer pick and run with it.


technology is fine - if it works
modernisation is fine - if it works
progress is fine - if it works
however another hare brained scheme from the government that will not work on the back of another hare brained scheme which didn't work. methinks you need to embrace the fact that the greatest waste of government resources and taxpayers money IS THE GOVERNMENT.
..yes.. I will embrace that!I know that this new service will be intended for incidents of a less serious nature, but does anyone know if there is an SMS service available for serious situations?
I was wondering about this the other day actually in one of my staring into space mind-tangents.
Can people send a text to 999 requesting police assistance if they are in immediate danger?
I'll make a 'for instance'. If a girl is being followed, she puts herself at risk by making a call, as putting the phone to her ear makes her less aware of the movements/actions of person behind her. Being able to discreetly send a text message (as most of my generation are well trained in from classroom disobedience) would solve the problem.
Sorry if this is seen as a thread wander.
'The initiative, which is part of a new Home Office drive to make police forces more responsive and accountable, is meant to help people who might not be certain how to report minor crimes.
Its introduction follows the failure of the new non-emergency number 101, which was introduced in 2005 to ease pressure on the 999 system but abandoned two years later.'
Text 66101 for police instead of calling 999 - Telegraph
I fail to understand how if Joe Bloggs didn't grasp the telephone number to ring for 'minor crimes', and that that initiative failed, how the introduction of a similar text scheme will be more successful.
I can certainly think of more important ways the police could have perhaps used the £3.5 million poind budget the scheme's cost.
lol @ cashy and lancs
I think it depends on how they expect it to work. The scheme in lancs is an emergency service, the control room act straight away. Its been rolling for a few months and i believe it has been used 40 odd times already, not a huge amount, but its not a figure we'd want to be high.
The point is that the police don't respond now to 999 or 101 so why spend £3.5 million on another scheme when they don't respond to the ones already in place. This government is top heavy with gimmicks and clueless people putting them in place
£3.5 million?.. peanuts!... considering that most insurance companies require a reported crime number that you get by phoning up your local police station .. and then the police having to call you back with a crime number ..I don't see that as practical and sure its costs more than £3.5 million...you lot need to get in touch with progress and embrace new technology!
I'll make a 'for instance'. If a girl is being followed, she puts herself at risk by making a call, as putting the phone to her ear makes her less aware of the movements/actions of person behind her. Being able to discreetly send a text message (as most of my generation are well trained in from classroom disobedience) would solve the problem.


We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.