Tranmere (home) thread

we all agree we were ****..... everyones allowed to say that. But win and no one posts, lose and its all Seamus fault, wrong team picked, wrong players bought, mickly mouse attitude..... when in reality we are a Conf side with a great manager who can use a bottom L2 budget and perform miracles. Dissect the performance by all means, but with a bit of realism and sensibility.

On Stanley On!
Best little club in the world bar none
 
That's not true though.... plenty of praise and discussion when we win. And that praise can be from the same people who might have moaned from the previous week.

Of course there will be negative posts after a defeat, but there's also praise for players that do well.
I agree that there's too much personal abuse on here. Calling people "imbeciles" not really necessary, but nothing wrong with robust and wildly different points of view.

Some people love Seamus, some don't. Overall it seems to even itself out.... what's wrong with that?
 
its a load of cobblers to me, hughes was having a bad time early on in season as was seamus both players improved quite a bit and did well, yeh always get stuff like this on any club site ive been on, those who cant see that dont really want too i think.
 
Willie Miller said:
we all agree we were ****..... everyones allowed to say that. But win and no one posts, lose and its all Seamus fault, wrong team picked, wrong players bought, mickly mouse attitude..... when in reality we are a Conf side with a great manager who can use a bottom L2 budget and perform miracles. Dissect the performance by all means, but with a bit of realism and sensibility.

On Stanley On!
Best little club in the world bar none
Click to expand...

Jase. I don’t post when we lose a match because I do not want to appear to be negative. Some people post when we lose and make sensible observations but then get called ‘Cretins’ or ‘Dense’. I simply don’t want to be targeted like that. When we Win on the other hand, I do post and I am always very positive. It is a real shame that the focus has changed from ‘Celebrating Success’ to ‘Throwing Insults’.
I would just like everyone to be more polite and positive!:theband:
ON STANLEY ON.:wave8:
KEEP THE FAITH.:mosher:
 
Lord Didsbury said:
That's not true though.... plenty of praise and discussion when we win. And that praise can be from the same people who might have moaned from the previous week.

Of course there will be negative posts after a defeat, but there's also praise for players that do well.
I agree that there's too much personal abuse on here. Calling people "imbeciles" not really necessary, but nothing wrong with robust and wildly different points of view.

Some people love Seamus, some don't. Overall it seems to even itself out.... what's wrong with that?
Click to expand...

I'll tell you what's wrong with that. Posters making personal comments (unfounded) about his personal life style.
 
Twenty Eight said:
I'll tell you what's wrong with that. Posters making personal comments (unfounded) about his personal life style.
Click to expand...

Correct me if I'm wrong mate, but are you saying that Seamus DOESN'T frequent Stringfellows Gentlemans Club!?!?!

Well I never, I was wrong all along :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
Twenty Eight said:
I'll tell you what's wrong with that. Posters making personal comments (unfounded) about his personal life style.
Click to expand...

its what the lad does on the pitch is what we should be on about. for me its a funny subject as he is not my favourite player but no one can argue that when he plays stanley do seem to play better. when he has a decent game so do the rest of the lads.
 
I can be arsed Sir.
He’s family and we are a close family.
Take a look at that persons posting history.
Anyway shut it down.
He’s made it personal.
I will deal with it personally.
 
chevyfire said:
Frustrating home defeat, if we had won I feel we could have felt safe but we have handed the submarines an olive branch and I feel we need 2 wins to make sure we maintain are hard fought league 1 status.
The game, first 10 minutes we started off really well, Clark and Johnson caused lots of problems. They scored there goal, Bursik mistake but I suppose all goalies have them occasionally. We shouldn't have allowed a header on goal in the first place. After this we struggled to get playing again. I don't remember Scott Davies having to make a decent save from this point. There second goal I feel finlay could have cleared his lines.
Despite Scott Davies profercating the home fans there is absolutely no place for spitting on him. A terrible example to set to our young fans.
The team tried there best but it just wasn't to be.
Good flag display and minutes silence before hand.
It's going to be tough ahead with our defensive injuries and suspensions along with difficult fixtures but hopefully we can scramble the necessary points.
I watched the video of the chap (Harry Stephenson) that died this morning/recently. Truly inspirational and emotionally, helps remind you of the spirit of our club and how we need to vocally support them to get them over the safety line so we can sing, "the Stanley's staying up!"

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Ban issued!!

https://www.accringtonstanley.co.uk/news/2020/march/club-statement/
 
How long is the ban?
Might be a good idea if people like this who want to come back are given some sort of club related community service first. Not as a punishment, but some way to see the good that the club does for the town and how everyone can play a part to keep it that way and take pride in it?
 
monkey hanger said:
thats what i have always thought with match banning orders. all you need to do is change your appearance slightly like wearing different clothes, hairstyle and beards etc and you,ll hardly be recognised. doubt any of his mates would dob him in either.
Click to expand...

Plenty did when the incident happened. Time for "self policing" maybe.
 
monkey hanger said:
thats what i have always thought with match banning orders. all you need to do is change your appearance slightly like wearing different clothes, hairstyle and beards etc and you,ll hardly be recognised. doubt any of his mates would dob him in either.
Click to expand...
To be fair, a lot did when the incident happened so I'm not sure they'd help him if he decided to risk coming back while the ban's in place
 
a lot depends on how much he actually wants to come back. still think if you change your appearance a bit and go into a different part of the ground then he would not be recognised. most people sit or stand in more or less the same spot and those around you know you but loads of other fans do not. its like when you go away there are more you do not recognise than you do.
 
I don't think the person in question will be able to change their appearance that easily, nor will they likely want too.
In my opinion, there is a miniscule chance that they will turn up to games keeping a low profile, sit/stand in a different part of ground on their own and then go home.

Trust the people involved at the club to be very hot on this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top