Wombles match thread

Back to one upfront at home says it all to me Bishop ineffective on his own saw the line up and stayed at home like a lot of others.
 
the line up might not have been to everyones taste me included but the result should have been different if pell and rodgers had put their headed efforts away as they should have done. 2 nil to stanley and i doubt they,d have come back from that.
 
Agree that if either of those headers had gone in it would have been a different story. Also missed the Captain second half but having said that Wimbledon seemed to play the conditions better than we did. Both their goals came from keeping it on the floor whereas we became too reliant on the long throw/ corner and hope for a break.
 
monkey hanger said:
the line up might not have been to everyones taste me included but the result should have been different if pell and rodgers had put their headed efforts away as they should have done. 2 nil to stanley and i doubt they,d have come back from that.
Click to expand...

They should have scored first missed an absolute sitter 1-0 to them it could have been worse doesn't paper over that they were the better side.
 
Most of the so called senior players were way below par last night Conneely, Pell, Hamilton in midfield never got a grip on the game Amankwah was frankly awful ripped apart time and again by a young player with no right foot Bishop isolated at least McConville put a few decent set pieces in rest was forgettable.
 
andyd said:
They should have scored first missed an absolute sitter 1-0 to them it could have been worse doesn't paper over that they were the better side.
Click to expand...
i thought they should have scored 2 first half, we were disgraceful last night i thought. that was one of the worst displays from us i have seen.
 
Exile on Spencer St said:
Can’t blame the weather, the pitch, the ref…Stanley were just b****y awful.
Click to expand...
I think you can blame all those things Exile, for a terrible game, but it was the same for both.....

Apart from the last 15 minutes - when we were two down - we were poor :(

I said it about the Fleetwood game - we were poor then!

Something is wrong fundamentally - just not sure what :confused: :confused:

One thing I am sure of, two of the players who might have affected the game, spent the night testing the weight load capacity of the seats in the dugouts :D

:) :) :)
 
its obvious to me whats wrong we should be playing with 2 upfront.:mad:even a poor display more chance of scoring.feel sorry for bishop the lad gets called by many when hes on his own and aint hes fault imho.
 
Last edited:
VALAIRIAN said:
I said it about the Fleetwood game - we were poor then!

Something is wrong fundamentally - just not sure what :confused: :confused:

or the curse of scoring 5 in the previous game against 10 men. or in fleetwoods case keeping a clean sheet when they were playing against 10 also. apart from the missed headers how much ping pong was there going on in their box that stanley didn,t get the important last touch.
Click to expand...
 
Lord Stiffupperlip said:
Can I suggest:
1. Lack of quality
2. Predictable game plan
3. Inability to change tactics when things go wrong.
Click to expand...

Your Lordship,
Who signed the players responsible for the lack of quality ?
Who selects the game plan ?
Who is responsible for changing tactics ?

On point one caused by the budget ?
 
Budget really controlled by a big extent by how many paying customers we have we are bottom of the table by some way on average attendance so whoever decides the rest will always be limited by budget,s here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top