Yorkshire Ripper

jaysay

jaysay

Resting in Peace
Overlooker
It appears that Yorkshire ripper Peter Sutcliffe is aiming to win his freedom by claiming his human rights have been breached. Thats funny didn't know animals came under the human rights act, and what about the rights of those women who he brutally killed, to me he should rot in hell never mind jail:mad:
 
jaysay said:
It appears that Yorkshire ripper Peter Sutcliffe is aiming to win his freedom by claiming his human rights have been breached. Thats funny didn't know animals came under the human rights act, and what about the rights of those women who he brutally killed, to me he should rot in hell never mind jail:mad:
Click to expand...

Has it not been overuled though Jaysay and that he will have to stay in prison for the rest of his life ? Just a short news bulletin I heard today.
 
was a good documentary on last night about the "mind" of that piece of crap, the "shrinks" have always argued he was mad, it showed evidence that went a long way to disproving that- but it was never submitted to the jury, which i think is abysmal:( i got the impression (my thoughts) that he will possibly be released sometime in the future.:mad:
 
He has got some hot shot lawyer working for him, a woman to boot. Just don't understand these people or is it just a money thing??
 
katex said:
Has it not been overuled though Jaysay and that he will have to stay in prison for the rest of his life ? Just a short news bulletin I heard today.
Click to expand...
Don't know kate didn't see the news tonight, just saw the item on cefax about 6pm. Just had another look and Jacqui Smith Home Secretary say's "It is hard to imagine circumstances in which Sutcliffe would be freed", but it looks like he is going ahead with his case according to his brief
 
jaysay said:
Don't know kate didn't see the news tonight, just saw the item on cefax about 6pm. Just had another look and Jacqui Smith Home Secretary say's "It is hard to imagine circumstances in which Sutcliffe would be freed", but it looks like he is going ahead with his case according to his brief
Click to expand...
well if he gets blazey involved- hes cracked it.:D;)
 
jaysay said:
Don't know kate didn't see the news tonight, just saw the item on cefax about 6pm. Just had another look and Jacqui Smith Home Secretary say's "It is hard to imagine circumstances in which Sutcliffe would be freed", but it looks like he is going ahead with his case according to his brief
Click to expand...
It is disgusting that any woman would defend him IMHO:mad:
 
Civil rights are for everyone, from saint to scum .... you can't have it any other way. We all know ... or should ... what repressive totalitarian govts. do when they take power, they suspend civil rights. And for good reason; individual rights guaranteed by a constitution written or implied are the basis of any democracy .... you can't have one without the other. Without those rights we couldn't even discuss this.
 
There are ways of getting around this within the system. Capital punishment is one of them; tho' I personally am opposed to that. In Canada there is provision for having someone declared a Dangerous Offender, which is a legal way of "throwing away the key". Neither of these encroach on the right to a fair trial and the best legal defence available, or on the right to appeal.
 
Eric said:
There are ways of getting around this within the system. Capital punishment is one of them; tho' I personally am opposed to that. In Canada there is provision for having someone declared a Dangerous Offender, which is a legal way of "throwing away the key". Neither of these encroach on the right to a fair trial and the best legal defence available, or on the right to appeal.
Click to expand...
And he is a dangerous offender I think most people would say!!!
 
you watch next will be his biography, then a film and that will pay for his hot shot lawyer.
 
pam1 said:
you watch next will be his biography, then a film and that will pay for his hot shot lawyer.
Click to expand...
OK let him write his book..............put a 1000 pound tax on all copies sold to pay for his keep and his appeal.......I am not in favour of raising tax for lost causes, but in this case go for it.
 
Although being a defence lawyer is a well-paid job, I couldn't do it. It wouldn't feel right if I had to stand up and defend someone who could well be guilty and if I knew they were guilty because of the evidence against them I would still have to defend them. What if they were set free for their horrid crime because I was a persuasive lawer? They could walk free and it would be my fault. I just couldn't live with the pressure, lots of money or not.
 
When someone takes away another person's most essential Human Right, the right to live, they should forfeit any rights themselves. Anyone who deliberately kills, injures or degrades another human being should be treated as a non-person and treated accordingley, in other words they should receive basic sustenance and shelter and nothing more.

Sutcliffe is yet another example of the way prisoners are better cared for than many of our oldest citizens. There are people who fought for this country in a world war who don't get free, heated accomodation, 3 free meals a day provided, free television and the free advice of lawyers (paid for by you and me) on how to get an even better deal.
 
He should have been put to death. If they let him out, either send him to me, and I will 'look after' him, :D:D, or lock him in a room full of men hating women.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top